Curtesy: ZDNet [Virtualisation suites compared]
Read original post here,
Product | Pros | Cons | Bottom line |
|
| XenServer has the most features of any free hypervisor, is easiest to install and manage, has excellent performance and VMs support up to 16 vCPUs. | |
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 Hyper-V
|
|
| It's still not as mature as VMware or XenServer, but it has a lot of momentum. Integration in a Windows environment will make this a strong hypervisor for those running mainly Microsoft. |
VMware vSphere
ESXi 5 |
|
| ESXi 5 is the market leader, which shows in the maturity of its product, the polish of its console and the vast number of support tools available. But it comes at a cost. |
Oracle VirtualBox 4.1.18
|
|
| VirtualBox is an inexpensive path for an individual or SMB to explore virtualisation. If your needs extend past VirtualBox running a production server and web server on a pair of VMs on a single server, you'll probably want to use another product. |
Read original post here,
No comments:
Post a Comment